There's no accounting for taste or so they say...
Which is why it should come as no surprise that popular
culture frequently veers off into left field when it takes up a cause elevating
the inconsequential to the lead on the nightly news.
Outrage over the ridiculous can take on the gravity of SOPA
if you mess with somebody's hero, virtual or otherwise.
So it was with Mass
Effect 3. A sci-fi themed RPG
morality play with elements of an FPS thrown in for good measure. Two years ago
it was a triple-A title from a franchise rivaled only by Call of Duty and Battlefield in
the gaming community.
But a month after its release it became the center of a firestorm
of controversy.
Why? Because fans
didn't like the ending. Bioware, the developer, had made it
abundantly clear that the storyline was coming to close with Mass Effect 3. Meaning that while decisions made during the
game ultimately affected the outcome, that outcome would always lead to the
same conclusion.
But it seems that wasn't enough for fans. Too many loose ends, the hero dying and huge
plot holes you could drive a truck through were too much for them. (sorry if there's any spoilers there)
So why do I bring a tired subject up now, 2 years
later? Well, mostly because Origin had a sale on Mass Effect 3 and I picked it up for $5
a few weeks ago. To me, that was a fair
price and if I was disappointed at least I had the benefit of personal
experience from which to lob my criticisms.
It took me a total of 37 hours over 2 weeks to complete the
single player game. I found it to be
slightly less engaging than Bioware's
other blockbuster, Bioshock, with
characters and gameplay that seemed more mechanical than other Bioware titles I've played. It was more something to get through than to
get excited about.
But that was ok. It
was a game not a life changing event. I
found myself contemplating my actions a bit more carefully after seeing the
effects of an ill considered decision but in the end it wasn't really of any
consequence. You were still going to
fight the "real" bad guys and unless you managed to slight every
conceivable race that could help you, the game was going to end the same.
If I really cared about the story I suppose I'd be
upset. For example at the end of the
game there were races of aliens that were supposedly joining in the effort that
were notably absent when the time came. There
was also scant explanation as to how a safe haven for 35 of my 37 hours had
suddenly turned into a chamber of horrors.
To be honest, I found Bioshock
a better franchise with a more compelling story even when it veered off into
the insane. A lot of the same elements
were there including the grinding boss battles but the story never failed to
support the game. Mass Effect 3 was the
direct opposite with a disjointed story and irrelevant character interactions
frequently getting in the way of the game.
From the perspective of the game and not the narrative,
however, it was still textbook Bioware. You were led down a tightly controlled path
that led you to visually stunning but minimally interactive environments. Then there were technical issues such as the
mannequin-like interactions between you and other NPC's and frequent map
glitches that could get you trapped in scenery.
That could be said for any modern title, however.
I'm not going to get bogged down in specifics though. Mostly because it's just a game (at this
point a $5 game) and as such it lived up to its potential. That being an entertainment medium and not a
personal relationship...
Look, games are just products and as such their only real
function is to entertain. Mass Effect 3 did that better than other
games that weren't trading on their narrative like Battlefield 4. Technically, nothing about the story would
keep your character from advancing on his skill tree or blowing away the waves
of bad guys.
It would just waste your time dealing with things that didn't save the galaxy.
It would just waste your time dealing with things that didn't save the galaxy.
In fact I would have preferred a more technical and less
narrative experience in Mass Effect 3. There were times when I became annoyed at the
moral and sexual ambiguities of the game.
Yes, I said "sexual" ambiguities.
Let's be honest, if I'm playing a game where I'm supposed to
be saving the whole freaking galaxy do I really need to concern myself with my
love life? Remember, you can sleep with
anyone you want, alienate the aliens and be as saintly or satanic as you want and still get the same ending.
So why are we pandering to sexual orientation?
Maybe this is where the outrage came from. Mass
Effect 3 is full of dead ends and the inclusion of political correctness
may have led players down the path to a false conclusion.
That being that the game is something more than it actually is.
That being that the game is something more than it actually is.
To be honest, the only game that's really moved me in recent
years was (of all things) a Call of
Duty title and it had nothing to do with whether or not the sarge went
"commando."
It was Call of Duty:
World at War and while I was playing the game I began to feel like I had a
better understanding of what a World War 2 veteran went through in the closing
days of the war. It was full of pain and
grit and moral ambiguity and I loved every minute of it.
That's where a good story improves a good game. I cared about characters that were every bit as fictional as Mass Effect's but it never got in the way of the core game.
That's where a good story improves a good game. I cared about characters that were every bit as fictional as Mass Effect's but it never got in the way of the core game.
Unlike Mass Effect 3
that had me worrying less about the fate of the universe and more about who
would end up in the captain's cabin for a nightcap.
That's a fail.
That's a fail.
I'll leave you with this.
If the ending of a game is important enough to you to threaten legal
action you may need to reassess your priorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment